Archive for Random Thoughts

Why Chinese ancient knowledge has survived more than Indian system?

It is very fascinating to me to see that Chinese medicine dominate the healthcare in Hong Kong. Ayurveda, the ancient Indian system of medicine is at best just helping people from losing their hair or easing their bowel movement. For people how know about ayurveda, will endorse that it is a fairly advanced system of medicine. Similar story for therapautic massages, or say martial arts – Kalaripayyatu is far gone when Shaolin is venerated. I really do not want to get into the analysis of if one  system was stronger than the other. But at a high level, I can say the counterparts in Chinese ancient body knowledge and of Indian are both nearly of the same merit. Then, how are Chinese methods surviving and thriving so well, making the Indian system envious.

If I am forced to explain that in one sentence – Colonisation happened before commercialisation in India and vice-versa in China.

I am hoping to research this area one level more and publish those thoughts. But think of it. The British came with their system of medicine (of other things) and the semi-literate (but well knowledgable) village doctor was discredited. Had this village doctor understood the concept of commercialisation, branding and scientific analysis of the product, he would have given a good run for the money to the new system.

While in China, the got colonised quite late and quite briefly. The system was better equipped to learn about the ‘ways of the white man’ and the body of medicine got institutionalised well to guard itself aganist the near annhilation from the western mode of medicine.

What say?

Leave a Comment

‘What caste is …?’

My mom made an ISD call to find what caste was Anjan. I had no clue. The funny thing was Anjan was my childhood pal, about whom I knew everything – likes, dislikes, first crush, favourite food, passions et al. ‘Caste’ did not ever feature in ‘everything’. Anjan was one of the MEB’s (Most Eligible Bachelor), serving Naval officer with all things one can admire about.

My mom had apparently seen a girl and wanted to know what ‘caste’ Anjan belonged so as do the match making. Did it matter to Anjan what caste she was, hell know but parents were hell bent on matching it.

Caste emerged as a social structure in the Indian society and has outlived its utility in most of the places. Anjan is a Brahmin (priest class) serving in the Navy and hence performing duties of a Kshatriya (warrior class). His father has his own business and adheres to the role of Vaishnavas (business class). But suddenly when it comes to marriage, parents remember what class they originally belong to.

Casteism is anchronistic phenomenon in the Indian urban society but a favourite past time of people for ocaassions like marriage. Suddenly, it becomes ‘us and them’

It would be really interesting to see how the new country with 700Mn below 25years who have entered the new millenium with internet connections, mobile phones and mobile jobs will eventually alter these old institutions.

Leave a Comment

Chak De! India

My temptation to compare the movie to ‘Miracle’ vanished 15 mins into the movie when the team building started. A nice touch of national integration without jingoism, fantastic cinematography, stellar performance by each of the actors makes the movie a potent mix. Its only other movie after ‘Jo jeeta wohi sikandar’, to have nail biting suspense in a ‘underdog’ sport.

Shimit Amin has deftly done the scenes focussed more on people and spirit than the actual game itself. So, you live with the character ignoring the possible conspicuous technical errors done by actors in a skilled sport like hockey.

Chak De! India

I loved the haryanvi and Punjabi characters, so true to life and hilarious. The bringing together of disparate people from a suave chandigarhi to uncouth jharkandi, and breaking their differences and moulding them together is second only to Lagaan. The need for the women to assert was put very delicately brought out without regular ‘nari shakti’ trites.

I dont know why unlike Miracle the film-makers have not credited the inspiration behind the story. The movie is based on Ranjan Negi who was the hockey goalkeeper of the Indian team during the Asian Games 1982. During the Asian games, India faced a defeat with the score of 1-7 against Pakistan. This was a humiliating experience for Negi. Later in his life, Negi coached the National Women’s hockey team and the team went on to win Gold at the Manchester Commonwealth games.

The pace is right, no item numbers, little of the yash’s overdoses, it is a must see!!

Leave a Comment

The 3 Layers of Love

Describing love is a little like Heisenberg Principle. ‘The more accurately you try to describe the more away from it you get’. Ergo, you can either describe (measure) it or be in it. I am just describing it.

There are 3 layers of love in a lasting relationship. (you have heard it? tarry my friend). I avoided the use of ‘stages’ because it would imply a chronology.

1. Spark:  It is that momentary foolishness that blinds you. Those wobbling of legs, being tongue-tied etc all fall in to this category. Sparks happen all through out the life with so many people, but like its name it disappears in a ‘moment’. Spark is essential to spice up the relationship. In a mature relationship, it need not be the wobbling of the legs but some surprise, a romantic getaway

2. Fulfillment: This is the stage where, to use Scott Peck’s words, the couple should spiritually enhance each other. In simple words, it represents those activities and moments which the couple enjoys doing together – like hiking, going to movies, singing together et al.

3. Co-Existent: This is the fundamental need, nothing romantic about it but constitutes nearly 3/4th of the ‘transactions’ in a relationship. These needs are very basic: physical need, security, societal pressures, work sharing, role playing. This is very ‘animal’ and essential need.

Just look around and analyse the relationships around you. I found most of the couples ‘co-exist’. (please note that the opinions are based on Indian middle-class life).  While arguing about arranged marriages, my parents often quote ‘Do you think uncle xyz is not happy?’. While I dont want to get into the debate of ‘what is happy?’, I simply believe what my parents are calling ‘happy’ is a healthy ‘co-existence’.

Failed ‘love-marriages’ are simply because they make decisions on a prolonged spark and semi fulfillment. Just because they love to see movies together doesnt mean that you will enjoy with that person the rest of your life.

Co-existing lovers. I have known romantic couples who get into the grind of life and forget the basis of their relationship – spark & fulfillment . Mundane needs like sex, bringing up children, doing household chores become a part of their existence. The just exist and fail to Live

An ideal relationship, in my mind, starts with a spark, finds both fulfillment and co-existence. It is important to have sparks  going in the already old relationship also. A surprise getaway, an unannounced trip, a bunch of red roses should do the magic…

Leave a Comment

‘Are you a virgin?’

<Inspired by a real question but fictionalised. Any characters resembling any person dead or alive is purely intentional. Names changed. Opinions are largely in Indian middle-class perspective>

‘Are you a virgin’? , It struck Anshu right on the face when she asked it. Like, near death experience his life flashed before his eyes, the girls he had tried to woo, the girls who tried to woo him, those evenings at the disco, those drunken days…. those days of forced celibacy. Being a virgin was a matter of pride for him, a indicator of his self control, the pillar of his personality, the foundation of his thought that relationship should not be based on just physical interaction.

‘Are you a virgin?’ sounded really cool, when Mahima Choudhary asked in Pardes . We all gossiped about it and really felt that Indian Cinema had come of age. Almost a decade later when Sarla asked him this question, he went through the near-death experience.

Arranged marriage had already become a nightmare for Anshu like many a men in India because one has to conform to a system he didnt believe in but had no choice than bow to the societal pressures falling on conservative boy who grew up in the hinterland. He was forced to go through the charade of meeting girls and asking about their ‘long-term goals’ (sic). He liked bold girls, one with substance, but this one was especially bold and she started off our discussion with this question.

He recovered a minute later and replied ‘ What would you prefer?’ She rhetorically replied, ‘ I want my future husband to be a virgin’. He drew a long breath and said ‘Sarla, before I answer your question, let me give you a perspective’

‘Dont judge a person in binary – virgin or not. There are 3 kinds of virgins and 3 kinds of non-virgins. The first kind of virgin is because of the society. He is afraid of what would happen if he crosses the line drawn by the society. The second type is because of lack of opportunity. He is all set to ‘do it’ but there are no takers. The third type is the one who believes, love should precede physical relationship and hasnt taken any relationship beyond love. Type I is a coward, Type II is a horny loser, Type III is of the noble type’

‘Non-virgins are again of 3 types. The first kind because he got into a relationship which blossomed into love and furthered into love making. The second kind is the one who is found lurking around the one-night-stand and has sleazy escapades. The third has paid money to lose his V. ‘

Type I is the true lover. Type II is a horny hog. Type III is a dirty dog.

I consider a true lover who has severed his old ties more desirable than any type of virin and a coward only better than a dirty dog. ‘

‘A Type I or II virgin wouldnt be able to be as loyal as the Type I non-virgin. I prefer to be a true lover than any other kind of virgin’

She was fretting impatiently while he was giving her unsolicited advise. Then she must have been thinking ‘Just tell me yes or no’

The discussion for me was over there. Anshu nonchalantly started walking away muttering ‘ The world is not black and white’. While she was just about to stamp ‘no-virgin’, Anshu turned back and said ‘By the way, I am virgin’

Anshu told me this story over a couple of drinks. I asked him why he walked away with just one question. He replied ‘She was not of my type’. Sometimes just one question screams out many a answer.

I was reflecting on how our generation is like a half boiled egg – the outer layer is firm but inner layer is so fluidy and confused. I relate to Anshu quite well because we are of such similar backgrounds. Having brought up in the hinterland of the Hindi belt, being a (pre-marital) celibate, tee-totaler, non-smoker is a sign of noble man. The values were fine when the world was so black and white but not anymore. People who have violate the Hindu tenet of ‘not crossing the seven seas’ going around the world, have seen the firm foundation of ‘values’ wobbling on its knees.

Anyways, Anshu is yet to find his life companion. With his permission, I decided to blog his theory because I thought it would bring things in perspective.

Comments (8)

Turning Left

Funny while I am thriving on the capitalist world, my thoughts have suddenly turned left. I am one of the examples of ‘shining India’. While I walk through the representatives of ‘wealth’, ‘progress’ in the countries I have lived for the past couple of years and then compare it to home, I wonder – ‘Is this progress really worth it?’

The GDP in India has grown by 9% while the people below the poverty line has remained steady. More Maybachs and Rolls Royce rolling on the street while same number of farmers committ suicide every year.

Capitalism is a dangerous thing when social security does not exist in a country. If progress of a country is reveled by noting the increase in the number of sales of coke bottles or detergents, we are missing something fundamental. While I was in the B-School, I was glad to know that we were the 4th largest economy and rested on the fact that we will be the second by year 2050 (or whichever). Would being the top GDP company make us any better country? Seeing the direction we are going, the answer is no.

We rank in the bottom 10 percentile in HDI, Woman Rights and all the related indices. A country cannot advance if the wealth is not evenly distributed. Dont mistake that I am propagating the message of communism. We need a more socially conscious market. The public-private partnership should give a (now famously proven) ‘headstart’ for the poorer masses in terms of better health, education and exposure.

We should stop forgetting that India, as Gandhiji said, ‘ is the land of villages’. Notwithstanding the fact that my family income must have increased by 15-20 times post-liberation, I wonder if we really made any progress over these years. The same number of people die out of starvation, 1/3rd of our people are still illiterate.

It helps to look a little left while riding the mammoth of capitalist economy!

Comments (1)

Best Bollywood movies of 2006

Easily, two movies unianimously emerge as the best movies of 2006 – Rang de Basanti and Lage Raho Munna Bhai. Each of these movies approaching contemprory India from two different poles, merge at the equator of basic principles born out of the struggle for Indian independence. 2006 brings together the two group who never saw eye to eye on the fundamentals but still strived for the same goal – moderates and the extremists.

Rang de Basanti – the last movie I saw before leaving India, through a mix of imagery, excellent editing, weaves two tales – one of the freedom struggle and one of current problems. What could be a utterly despicable act – murder of the minister – doesnt look so bad when juxtaposed against the Bhagat SIngh’s story of heroism. A critcally acclaimed and a commercially success movie brought out interest in the martyrs who died for the struggle.

Freedom struggle in my mind is a critical period in Indian history not just because of the hackneyed ‘driving away the british’ argument but because it created ‘India’ which was a mythical concept. <More on revolution>. The movie also draws subtle parallels by potraying wayward youth converging on a goal and achieving it comparing it of times where the none had imagined the nations destiny and small principalities came together to launch a successful struggle. Not to mention the good quality comedy that keeps the movie warm all along.

Lage Raho Munnabhai – Its a subtle irony that a man who shunned materialism and spiritually led a national movement is a proxy for materialism thanks to his face printed on the currency notes. I have read Gandhi’s global gyan read out out-of-context, displayed on the public urinals not understanding how to apply it. By attributing fixed meaning to words, we make them mortal. Words become immortal when their meanings evolve and interpreted according to the context. $$$ immortalised Gandhism by applying them to the modern day context. the movie enhances the value of gandhian ideals by decreasing the unipolarity of the gandhian way – either this or nothing else. The fundamental reason the movie hit the right chord is that it potrayed Gandhism as a possible option to solve a problem, not the only way. I am myself a Gandhivadi while taking sides on the nature of freedom movement, but LRM very delicately convinced me that ‘Gandhism is not THE way but a good first coption’.

Never before a comedy movie was so pregnant with meaning since the days of Charlie Chaplin and never had a precedence in conveying a moral.

Comments (1)

The West , The Chinese and the Indians

This is continuation of my earlier blog on comments on article by Gentle Rain (GR).

I kind of agree with him when he says about the way the westerns and the easterns think (he has extended the courtesy of identifying the indians uniquely).

The ease with which we Indians have adopted to the western thinking is several times rightly attributed to English colonialism (Related Who is an Indian ) , I think it is more deeper than that. I am sure that the Chinese wouldnt transition to western thought or English, as easily as we did. My premise is language is culture and culture is language – existing in symbiosis.
Indian thought and languages have evovled over milleniums and is based on very logial constructs as much as abstractions. Sanskrit, the mother of almost 80% of Indian languages is considered the most(sic) perfect language. As logical as it gets, a good deal of abstraction and complex patterns are embedded in the works written over centuries.

English (proxy for western thought) joined this league as late as 15th century while rennaisance happened. Science and mathematics was suddenly revived after centuries of interlude between Pythagoras and Galileo. The language and hence the culture (or is it vice-versa) evolved both in logic and abstraction because of the increasing need to express things in a written format.

Indians follow the same thought pattern and it is easy to absorb the western culture (Do we need to do it? is a seperate question) and hence English (call centres, anyone?)

Its not gonna be a easy ride for the Chinese. I feel the Chinese (like their language) think very abtractly and less in logical patterns. Their structuring of though (and language) cannot be directly correlated to English. The fundamental fabric of the thought and culture is different, and it is going to be a challenge to adopt English language and western thought patterns.

Another angle of Chinese thought is that it is a Confusian society – top down. There is little room of individuality and relationships are very complex. It is unthinkable for the Chinese to challenge authority (on an average).

<Sorry for the abdrupt end>

Comments (2)

World Map and you!

There are 192 country-members of the UN, Vatican is not a member, and outside supporter of the Taiwan cause I would add it to my list of countries. So there are 194 countries in THE world map.

I think each country has its own world-map, based on stereotypic biases – not officially I mean, mentally. Yeah, officially it is surely different – Israel doesnt exist in the maps of many Middle Easterners, Indian boundaries are different on either side of the boundary etc. I am not interested in that debate – its political. I am talking about ‘mental maps’ of people. Some countries dont exist at all, some exist in clusters, some have different names …

Let me explain the ‘Indian’ world map.

1. America and UK – ‘Normal foreign countries’ dream place to be

2. Europe – these days dimly appearing on the map of many people – earlier was the ‘country’ of world wars – now it is potential for ‘onsite’ opportunities thanks to the software boom

3. Middle East – Mallu paradise and ‘Bhai-logon’ ka holiday destination, oil ‘factory’

4. East of India beyond Bangladesh – ‘Chinkies’ (sic) ! some intelligent ones have started distinguishing between Japanese, Koreans (thanks to LG), China (thanks to the competition to become world most populous country). Also seen as the place for electronic goods.

5. Africa – ‘country’ of black people with some Indians at the south of it (South Africa).

6. South America practically doesnt exist because Brazil is African (yes, people really think that) country with Carnival and good football team, Argentina is European team with Maradona

7. Russia – people are still stuck with former USSR map, can we keep on buying Atlas every year? – communist (???) friend of India. Publisher of Misha comics.

8. Australia – European country till one of their relatives boards a plane flying east, someone tells them that it somewhere in the south east.

Hello… Taiwan ko bhool gaye kya? ‘Isnt it china?’

Thailand? ‘Which one?’ Wahi Bangkok wala ‘Oh, Accha bangkok thailand main hain kya – suna hain waha….’
Wait, Wait.. we just ran out of countries…how much did we county 15-20 , what about Lituvania, Georgia, Ukraine ….

This is one of the areas we are better off than the Americans…. they have still smaller maps.

1. China – cheap goods

2. India – call centres

3. Japanese – the ones we nuked

4. Israel – legitimate master of the middle east and surrounded by enemies (also of the US)

5. Middle East – Oil producing ‘Arabs’

6. Europe – where our military was active during the world wars

7. East Asia – where our miliary was active in 70s-80s

8. US – centre of the earth (or was it Universe) , country of Nobel Laureates and most importantly creator of the most nutritious meal – SuperSize McMeal

Check this Map drawn by Bush

Who told you there are 194 countries????

Leave a Comment

‘ I rather learn a foreign language ya’

We insanely teased Monica when she said this years ago in Bangalore. This was her response to my question ‘Why dont you learn Kannada (local language in Bangalore)?’ . I was genuinely amused at her statement and classified it as ‘angrez’ snob statement.

We all grow up, dont we? After so many years, her statement doesnt amuse me any more but infact seems like a prophesy to me. I took up a job in Pune (Maharashtra State) where they speak Marathi and by the virtue of the same job moved to Taipei. I stayed more time in Pune than in Taipei but know more Chinese than Marathi. I enrolled for Chinese course and worked hard at it. I can read basic Chinese but I hardly understand a word in Marathi – the language of my neighbouring province because I didnt put any effort to learn it.

After years Monica’s (apparently) silly statement looks so profound today! India is a land of many langauges and you will live all your life not understanding what your neighbours speak. With such accelerated movement people across the state (province) borders due to the booming economy and with English & Hindi emerging as the lingua franca, there is little motivation to learn the language of the local province. I can manage with hindi in Pune, you can speak to the vegetable sellers in English in Bangalore. Given a choice if I move to Madras (they speak Tamil) I would rather learn Spanish for my career advancement than learn Tamil. What is one’s motivation to learn the local language?

While that is a good news for a virbrant economy because it eases movement of people from place to place it spells a doom to the local languages. I realise that only the Kannadigas (ethnic Karnataka people) would learn Kannada and NO ONE else would ever learn it. What is one’s motivation to learn the language. A neighbouring Tamilian would rather learn French – language of the land thousands of miles away than Kannada which is the neighbouring tongue. I dont blame him, this is purely market-driven.

People ask me in Taipei, ‘When did you learn English?’. Some are surprised when they find out that I learnt English right from my kinder garten. I have learnt all those ‘Baa Baa black sheep…’ like the American kids (native English speakers) learn. So much so, I ‘think’ in English, conduct business in English, speak with my friends in hindi and to my parents in Kannada. I use my mother tongue only for less than 5% of my communication!!!

Languages

So my conjecture is, if ONLY kannadigas learn Kannada and only 5% of the time they use their language and thanks to the ‘Monica syndrome’, are we all gonna lose our languages? This is a question that many Indian languages would have no answers. Kannada movies are giving way to Bollywood and subsequently Holly wood. How do we save our languages without compromising on the globalisation (English) and our national identity ( Hindi).?

Your guess is as good as mine!!
P.S. Irony is not lost on the fact that I can superflously talk about ‘saving my language’ in English than in my OWN language.

Comments (1)

Older Posts »
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.